A storm of legal, social, and political issues has erupted around Sharmistha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student and social media influencer from Pune, who was arrested for allegedly sharing a derogatory video about Islam and Prophet Muhammad on the platform X (formerly Twitter).

On Tuesday, June 3, the Calcutta High Court refused to grant interim bail to Panoli, citing the sensitivity of the matter and the importance of balancing freedom of expression with communal harmony. The case has stirred debates around digital speech, religious sentiments, and legal procedures under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Background of the Controversy

Sharmistha Panoli came under fire after she posted a video on X that reportedly contained objectionable and derogatory comments against Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. The video triggered a wave of outrage online, leading to multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) being registered against her across several locations.

Panoli quickly deleted the video and issued a public apology, but the legal consequences were already in motion. Despite the apology, she was arrested by Kolkata Police from Gurugram in May 2025 and taken into custody under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for:

• Promoting enmity between communities,

• Inciting public unrest,

• And hurting religious sentiments.

Court’s Rationale for Denial of Bail

Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, who presided over the matter, stated clearly in the court:

“We have freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean one can go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with people from different castes, creeds, and religions.”

He emphasized that the limits of free speech end where communal harmony begins. The court acknowledged that while the accused had taken the video down, the damage caused to public sentiment had already occurred.

In a significant move, the court stayed all FIRs filed outside the jurisdiction of the Garden Reach police station, indicating that Panoli would face legal action only in Kolkata for the time being. However, her plea for ad-interim bail was denied, and the judge stated that the matter would be reconsidered on June 5 after examining the case diary.

Legal Arguments from Panoli’s Counsel

Panoli’s legal team raised a number of constitutional and procedural concerns regarding the arrest:

• Offences listed in the FIRs are non-cognisable, meaning police require a magistrate’s permission to arrest—which they claim was not obtained.

• No prior notice was served to Panoli before arrest, which is mandatory under the new BNSS, her counsel argued.

• Her arrest was executed in Gurugram by Kolkata Police, further raising questions about jurisdiction and procedural compliance.

Despite these submissions, the High Court remained firm on its stance, reiterating the importance of community sensitivity in a diverse and pluralistic society.

Judicial Custody and Next Steps

On Saturday before the hearing, Panoli was produced before the Alipore Court in Kolkata, which remanded her to 14 days of judicial custody. With the interim bail plea denied, she remains in custody until further hearing on June 5, when the Calcutta High Court will re-evaluate her bail after reviewing the case materials.

Freedom of Speech vs Public Sentiment: A Broader Debate

The case has once again reignited a nationwide debate on the extent of freedom of speech in India, particularly on social media platforms, where content can go viral instantly, reaching millions and leading to unintended or deliberate communal consequences.

While India’s Constitution guarantees free speech under Article 19(1)(a), it is subject to reasonable restrictions, particularly related to:

• Public order,

• Morality,

• Security of the State,

• And communal harmony.

The court’s remarks highlight the balancing act the judiciary must perform between upholding fundamental rights and preserving public order in a deeply pluralistic society.

BNSS and Procedural Safeguards in Focus

One major legal angle brought up in this case is the application of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), the new criminal code replacing the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Panoli’s legal team has argued that:

• BNSS provisions require notice before arrest in non-cognisable offences.

• These protections were allegedly bypassed in this case, making the arrest procedurally defective.

The court has not yet ruled on this aspect directly but is expected to scrutinize these arguments on June 5 when it examines the case diary and arrest details.

Public Reaction and Social Media Discourse

The arrest has drawn polarised reactions across the internet:

• Some netizens defend Panoli’s freedom of speech, citing that apologies and video deletions should have sufficed.

• Others argue that hate speech must have legal consequences, especially when it targets specific religious communities and incites unrest.

With Panoli being a young law student, many are also questioning the impact of cancel culture and criminal prosecution on youth influencers, while legal experts stress the importance of responsible content creation.

Final Thoughts and What to Expect Next

As the next hearing is scheduled for June 5, the legal community, civil rights activists, and general public will be watching the case closely. Key developments to monitor include:

• The Calcutta High Court’s review of the case diary and procedural compliance under BNSS.

• Whether Panoli’s arrest will be deemed valid or violative of legal norms.

• Potential withdrawal or merging of FIRs into a single legal case, given the court’s stay on all but one.

This case might set a precedent for how digital speech and religious sensitivity are handled under the new legal codes in India.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Sacheerome Limited, Ganga Bath Fittings, Victory Electric Vehicles International, Wagons Learning.

The Current active IPO are 3B Films

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.

Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.