Delhi High Court Slams Baba Ramdev for "Sharbat Jihad" Comment on Rooh Afza
Team Finance Saathi
22/Apr/2025

What's covered under the Article:
-
Delhi High Court slams Baba Ramdev's "sharbat jihad" comment against Hamdard's Rooh Afza.
-
Hamdard accuses Ramdev of making defamatory and communal remarks about the product.
-
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi compares Ramdev's remarks to hate speech targeting religion.
The Delhi High Court has recently pulled up Baba Ramdev for his controversial comment about Hamdard's Rooh Afza, calling the remarks “indefensible” and shocking to the conscience of the court. The case, which centers on allegations of defamation and communal remarks made by the yoga guru, has stirred significant controversy in both legal and public circles. The court was hearing a defamation suit filed by Hamdard Laboratories, the makers of the popular Rooh Afza drink, against Ramdev, who made what the company described as defamatory and communal statements.
The "Sharbat Jihad" Comment
On April 3, Baba Ramdev made a public statement regarding Hamdard's Rooh Afza, alleging that the money earned from the popular drink was being used for the construction of masjids and madrasas. He referred to it as a "sharbat jihad", which he claimed was a means of promoting a religious agenda through a consumer product. Ramdev's remarks immediately sparked a backlash, particularly among sections of the public and political groups, accusing him of communalizing a widely consumed product and targeting a specific religious community.
The term “sharbat jihad” struck a controversial chord, suggesting that there was an ulterior, religiously motivated agenda behind a product that has been marketed as a refreshing drink enjoyed by people of all faiths. Hamdard, on the other hand, took immediate legal action, claiming that Ramdev’s statement was defamatory and intended to divide communities, as it implied a communal and religious motive behind the product’s popularity.
The Court's Reprimand
The Delhi High Court, while hearing the case, expressed its strong disapproval of the remarks made by Baba Ramdev. Justice Amit Bansal noted that the comments made by the yoga guru were “shocking” and were considered “indefensible” in the eyes of the law. The court emphasized that such statements could cause damage to the reputation of the company, as well as fuel communal tensions in the society. In his remarks, Justice Bansal made it clear that the court would not tolerate any statements that aimed to undermine the integrity of a business or the harmony among communities in India.
The Legal Battle: Hamdard's Defamation Case
The legal suit filed by Hamdard Laboratories accused Ramdev of defamation and called his remarks a blatant attempt to create religious divides. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Hamdard, strongly argued that Ramdev’s statement was not only defamatory but also amounted to hate speech. Rohatgi argued that the statement was not just about disparaging a product, but about making communal allegations that targeted the company based on its association with Muslim founders and its role in building religious institutions.
Rohatgi went on to claim that the case went beyond the disparagement of the Rooh Afza product and involved a deliberate attempt to stir religious sentiments. The lawyer emphasized that such remarks were part of a larger pattern of religious polarization and needed to be checked by the court. He made it clear that the matter involved not just the reputation of a company but the larger issue of communal harmony in India.
Baba Ramdev’s Public Persona and Controversial Statements
Baba Ramdev, the yoga guru and co-founder of Patanjali Ayurved, is known for his public statements on a wide range of issues, from health to politics. However, in recent years, he has faced criticism for his controversial comments on various social and religious matters. His remarks have often sparked public debates about the fine line between freedom of speech and hate speech.
In this case, Ramdev’s remark about Hamdard and Rooh Afza appears to fall within a broader trend of politicizing everyday consumer products and creating a narrative of communal identity around them. His comments were perceived as an attempt to question the loyalties and values of the Muslim-run company, sparking outrage not just among the company’s supporters but also in various sections of society.
The Bigger Picture: Impact on Society
The "sharbat jihad" comment has caused a stir far beyond the legal realm. It reflects the ongoing challenge in India of balancing free speech with communal harmony. Statements like these have the potential to polarize communities and fuel religious tensions, especially in a diverse country like India where religious identity often intertwines with economic, social, and political dynamics.
The court's strong stance against Ramdev's remarks sends a clear message about the limits of public discourse and how statements that target specific communities or products based on religion can have severe consequences. It highlights the importance of responsible speech in a multicultural society and underscores the role of the judiciary in protecting communal peace and social harmony.
The Legal Journey Ahead
As the Delhi High Court continues to hear the case, it will be interesting to see how the legal arguments unfold. Baba Ramdev has yet to file a formal response to the suit, and the court will likely consider whether his comments truly amount to defamation and hate speech. In addition to the legal ramifications, this case could also set a precedent for how future remarks by public figures, particularly those with a political or religious following, are treated in a legal context.
Conclusion
This ongoing legal battle between Baba Ramdev and Hamdard Laboratories is more than just a case of defamation; it is a reflection of the broader social and political issues at play in India today. The Delhi High Court’s strong reprimand of Ramdev highlights the importance of accountability for public figures who make statements that could undermine social unity and religious tolerance. The court's decision will not only impact the parties involved but could also influence how communal comments are treated by the judiciary in the future.
The case serves as a reminder that in a diverse country like India, responsible speech is key to maintaining social peace, and the legal system plays a crucial role in protecting individuals and businesses from defamatory and harmful remarks.
The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Tankup Engineers.
Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.
Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.