In a major development that has stirred fresh controversy during the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2025 between India and England, Indian team officials have formally approached the ICC match referee with a complaint, alleging that they were given an inappropriately aged replacement ball during a key juncture of the Lord’s Test. This complaint has sparked renewed debate around transparency, fairness, and ball management protocols in international cricket.

India’s Complaint: 30-Over-Old Ball After Just 10 Overs

According to Indian team officials, during the third Test match at Lord’s, the ball began to lose shape unusually early—after just 10 overs of play. As per standard cricketing procedure, the team requested a replacement ball. However, instead of a similarly used ball, India was allegedly given a ball that was already 30–35 overs old.

This replacement proved critical. The Indian bowlers had dominated up to that point, with Jasprit Bumrah dismantling England’s batting order, having taken key wickets including Ben Stokes, Joe Root, and Chris Woakes in a sensational spell. But after the ball change, India lost control, England’s tail wagged effectively, and the hosts went from 271/7 to 355 all out, with Jamie Smith and Brydon Carse scoring pivotal half-centuries.

India eventually lost the Test match by 22 runs, a margin that team officials claim was deeply influenced by the inappropriate replacement ball.

Violation of Protocol? India Questions ICC Standards

Team India’s contention stems from the lack of transparency regarding the age of the replacement ball. As per current ICC regulations, the replacement ball must match the usage of the original ball—meaning if the original had been used for 10 overs, the replacement too should be roughly 10 overs old.

An Indian team official, quoted by The Indian Express, said:

“At Lord’s, after about 10 overs, the Dukes ball lost its shape. The umpires didn’t have a ball that was 10 overs old, so we got one that was 30-35 overs old. This changed the game entirely. Check the scoreboard and see the shift.”

He further emphasized,

“We weren’t informed about the replacement ball’s age. Had we known, we would have continued with the misshaped ball.”

The official called for the ICC to revise its rules, ensuring transparency regarding replacement ball age and introducing accountability in how balls are chosen and distributed during Test matches.

Concerns Over Ball Type and England's Alleged Preference

The controversy deepened with India also accusing England of being granted preferential access to specific types of balls. In the ongoing series, balls with a darker shade of red have shown to swing more, thus offering bowlers an edge.

The Indian team revealed that during ball selection, the fourth umpire once brought a box with only one dark-shaded ball, which India requested. However, they were told that England had already selected that specific ball for their use as the second new ball.

An Indian official was quoted saying:

“We are not alleging anything, but this kind of selective access raises serious questions.”

He also stressed the need for ball selection to occur in the match referee’s office, under neutral supervision, and not in dressing rooms with only local umpires present.

Historical Precedence: Ball Change Controversies Not New

Ball change controversies are not unprecedented in international cricket. Several teams have, in the past, raised concerns over replacement ball condition, reverse swing advantages, and even tampering. However, this specific instance—where the replacement was significantly older than the original and impacted the outcome of the game—has reignited scrutiny.

The Dukes ball used in England is known for its durability and swing, but this series has seen the ball go out of shape frequently, as acknowledged by both players and commentators.

ICC’s Response Pending

As of now, the ICC has not made a public statement regarding India’s complaint. However, sources confirm that the issue was raised officially and that the match referee has acknowledged receipt of the formal communication from Indian officials.

Whether the ICC will initiate an investigation or introduce rule modifications in response to this episode remains to be seen.

Implications for the Series and the Spirit of the Game

This issue has come at a time when tensions between the two teams are already high, and every Test in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy has been intensely fought. With England currently leading the series, this controversy could cloud the competitive integrity of the tournament.

India’s request for clearer rules around replacement balls may resonate beyond this series, prompting larger conversations around fairness, consistency, and the importance of standardising match equipment usage.

What Indian Fans and Experts Are Saying

Many Indian fans and experts have come out in support of the team’s stance. On social media, hashtags like #BallGate, #ReplacementBallRow, and #JusticeForIndia have been trending. Former cricketers have voiced concern as well.

Parthiv Patel commented:

“This is a serious issue. If a team isn’t informed about the ball’s age and it ends up being 30 overs old, it’s unfair.”

Meanwhile, fans have dug up scoreboard statistics and swing metrics to show how the dynamics shifted dramatically after the ball change at Lord’s.

What Happens Next

The final Test of the series is underway at The Oval, with weather forecasts predicting possible interruptions. But even as the on-field action unfolds, this off-field controversy may cast a long shadow over the series finale and could influence future rule-making by the ICC.

The Indian team has made it clear: they are not just playing for runs and wickets but also for fairness, transparency, and accountability in the game’s governance.

In Summary:

• India has alleged unfair replacement ball usage during a critical phase of the third Test at Lord’s

• Officials claim they were given a 30-35 overs old ball after only 10 overs of play

• A formal complaint has been lodged with the ICC, calling for a rule change to ensure transparency in ball replacements

• The incident has sparked wider scrutiny and could lead to changes in international Test cricket protocols going forward

This controversy now becomes a defining subplot of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2025 and serves as a reminder that even in a gentleman’s game, procedural clarity and fairness are non-negotiable.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are BLT Logistics, Bhadora Industries, Highway Infrastructure, Flysbs Aviation, Parth Electricals & Engineering, Jyoti Global Plast, Essex Marine, Aaradhya Disposal Industries.

The Current active IPO are Cash Ur Drive Marketing, Renol Polychem, B.D. Industries (Pune), NSDL, Takyon Networks, Mehul Colours, M&B Engineering, Sri Lotus Developers & Realty, Aditya Infotech, Lakshmi India Finance, Kaytex Fabrics.

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.

Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.