India Warns WTO of Counter Duties Over Trump-Era Auto Tariffs

In a significant escalation of trade tensions with the United States, India has formally told the World Trade Organization (WTO) that it reserves the right to suspend trade concessions and impose counter duties in response to Trump-era auto tariffs imposed by Washington.

This move is rooted in the long-running dispute over Section 232 tariffs that the U.S. imposed on steel, aluminium, and threatened on automobiles and auto parts, citing national security concerns. India argues these tariffs are protectionist, unilateral, and violate WTO rules, and is now moving to retaliate using the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism.

Background of the Dispute

Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act gives the President power to impose tariffs on imports deemed a threat to national security.

• Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminium in 2018.

• Trump also threatened auto tariffs, sparking global concerns.

India, among other affected nations, opposed these moves, arguing they violated WTO rules that require consultations before such trade measures.

India’s Stand at the WTO

India’s recent communication to the WTO emphasizes:

• Violation of procedures: The U.S. imposed tariffs without required consultations.

• WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) allows retaliation if a member breaches obligations.

• Right to suspend concessions: India may withdraw equivalent trade benefits previously given to U.S. goods.

By officially notifying the WTO, India is exercising its legal rights under international trade law.

Trump-Era Tariffs and India’s Grievance

The Trump administration’s Section 232 tariffs disrupted global supply chains, raising costs for exporters.

• India’s steel and aluminium industries suffered higher U.S. duties, limiting market access.

• The threat of auto tariffs further rattled global trade.

India’s submission argues these actions were:

• Unilateral.

• Unjustified under national security exemptions.

• Inconsistent with WTO commitments.

Why Counter Duties?

Counter duties are retaliatory tariffs imposed when a trading partner violates WTO rules.

Under WTO DSU:

• Members must hold consultations before imposing restrictive measures.

• Failure allows the other party to withdraw equivalent concessions.

India is proposing counter duties valued to offset damage caused by the U.S. measures, pressuring Washington to negotiate.

Government’s Official Position

India stated:

“India reserves the right to suspend concessions given to the United States as it did not hold consultations before imposing tariffs.”

This stance:

• Signals India’s resolve to defend domestic industries.

• Asserts its commitment to rules-based trade.

Implications for Bilateral Trade

India and the U.S. enjoy robust overall trade ties, valued over $190 billion annually.
But tensions persist over:

• Market access.

• Regulatory barriers.

• Tariff disputes.

Retaliatory tariffs risk:

• Disrupting supply chains.

• Raising costs for consumers and businesses.

• Complicating broader diplomatic relations.

However, India’s move is carefully calibrated within WTO rules, aiming to press the U.S. to negotiate.

Next Steps at the WTO

Typically, WTO procedure will now involve:

• Review of India’s claim.

• Possible arbitration over damage valuation.

• Authorization for retaliatory measures if India’s claim is upheld.

The U.S. may:

• Challenge India’s calculation.

• Seek settlement through bilateral talks.

This process can take months or even years, but the notification itself is a powerful negotiation tool.

Potential Targets for Counter Duties

India has not published the list of U.S. products to face new tariffs. But trade experts suggest possible targets include:

• Agricultural imports like almonds and apples.

• Industrial equipment and machinery.

• Consumer goods such as cosmetics and packaged foods.

India will seek to:

• Maximize pressure on U.S. exporters.

• Minimize domestic pain for Indian consumers and industries.

Historical Context of India-U.S. Trade Frictions

This is part of a longer pattern of disputes:

• 2018 Section 232 tariffs sparked widespread retaliation.

• GSP withdrawal in 2019 hurt India’s duty-free exports to the U.S.

• Disputes over medical device price controls and ICT tariffs.

Yet, both countries value their strategic partnership and often work to resolve disputes diplomatically.

Why Is This Move Important for India?

Domestic significance:

• Shows government’s commitment to protect Indian industries.

• Counters criticism of weak negotiation stance.

• Highlights “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India) agenda.

International significance:

• Reinforces India’s reputation as a rules-based trading partner.

• Sets precedent for holding powerful economies accountable.

• Strengthens India’s leverage in future negotiations.

Trade Expert Analysis

Experts note:

• India is within its WTO rights to pursue counter duties.

• Notification sends a strong diplomatic message.

• Raises pressure on the U.S. to address Indian concerns seriously.

However, they caution that tariff escalation risks harming both economies and should ideally be avoided through talks.

Broader Global Trade Context

This move also reflects wider frustrations with the global trading system:

• WTO’s dispute settlement system is paralysed due to U.S. blockages.

• Many countries are resorting to unilateral measures and retaliation.

• Global supply chains remain vulnerable to trade wars.

India’s stand demonstrates:

• Commitment to multilateral rules.

• Readiness to defend its economic interests.

Impact on Indian Exporters and Importers

Retaliatory tariffs will be carefully targeted to:

• Avoid hurting Indian manufacturers dependent on U.S. inputs.

• Protect small traders from cost spikes.

• Focus on high-value U.S. exports to India.

Such calibration is critical to minimize domestic fallout.

Diplomatic and Political Stakes

While trade tensions are real, both governments:

• Value strategic cooperation in defence, technology, and regional security.

• Participate together in groups like the Quad.

• Share interest in countering China’s rise.

Trade frictions must therefore be managed carefully to avoid undermining broader cooperation.

Government’s Message to Domestic Audience

By taking this step at the WTO, the government signals:

• It is not passive in defending Indian economic interests.

• It will hold even the biggest economies accountable.

• It is committed to fair and balanced trade, protecting Make in India priorities.

Conclusion

India’s notification to the WTO reserving its right to impose counter duties on U.S. imports marks a strong assertion of its trade rights.

It sends a clear signal that:

• India will use WTO rules to defend its interests.

• It expects fair treatment and consultations before new tariffs.

• Retaliatory measures are legal and justified under WTO procedures.

While the dispute could escalate, it also opens the door for negotiated settlement, demonstrating India’s maturity and preparedness in handling complex global trade challenges.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Asston Pharmaceuticals, CFF Fluid Control, Smarten Power Systems, Glen Industries, Travel Food Services, Anthem Biosciences, Chemkart India.

The Current active IPO are Meta Infotech, Happy Square Outsourcing Services, Cryogenic OGS.

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.

Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.