Intel’s CEO Lip-Bu Tan Under Spotlight for Ties to Chinese Military Tech Firms

Team Finance Saathi

    11/Apr/2025

What's covered under the Article: 

  1. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel’s newly appointed CEO, has invested in over 600 Chinese tech firms, including some linked to the People’s Liberation Army.

  2. Intel’s $3 billion contract with the US Department of Defense is raising concerns amid Tan’s extensive ties to China’s tech and defense sectors.

  3. Tan’s previous investments through Walden International include sanctioned and sensitive firms, prompting mixed reactions from investors and policymakers.

Lip-Bu Tan, a renowned Silicon Valley investor and founder of Walden International, has recently been appointed as the CEO of Intel, the United States' largest chip manufacturer. While his appointment was initially celebrated due to his deep experience in technology investments, a Reuters investigation has sparked controversy around Tan’s extensive financial ties to Chinese tech firms, including some with links to China’s military – the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

This revelation is particularly critical given Intel’s key role in producing advanced semiconductors for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). As the only American firm, alongside TSMC and Samsung, that can manufacture cutting-edge chips, Intel's leadership is under close scrutiny due to potential national security implications.


Lip-Bu Tan’s Web of Investments in China

A detailed review of Chinese and U.S. corporate filings shows that Tan maintains stakes in over 600 Chinese companies. Through Walden International and two Hong Kong-based holding firms – Sakarya Limited and Seine Limited – Tan controls at least 40 Chinese entities directly, and indirectly, through minority interests.

More concerning are his co-investments with state-backed Chinese firms, including China Electronics Corporation (CEC) – a company sanctioned by the Trump administration in 2020 for its ties to the PLA. In fact, Walden International has invested in six firms jointly with CEC, highlighting potential strategic alignments that could conflict with U.S. national interests.

Additionally, Walden's investments often align with municipal Chinese government funds from innovation hubs such as Hangzhou, Hefei, and Wuxi.


Connections to Sanctioned and Defense-Aligned Firms

One of the most significant red flags in Tan’s investment history is his past association with Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC). This is China’s largest chip foundry, known for its military connections and currently under U.S. government sanctions. Tan was an early investor in SMIC, serving on its board for years, and Walden International reportedly exited SMIC only in January 2021.

Reuters also highlighted that Tan had invested at least $200 million in China’s advanced manufacturing sector, with multiple investments in firms supplying the PLA between 2012 and 2024. Despite claims from a source close to Tan that he has since divested from these firms, public Chinese corporate records continue to show him as an investor in many.


Intel’s Strategic Role for U.S. Defense

Intel isn’t just another tech firm—it is integral to the U.S. national defense strategy. With a $3 billion contract to manufacture chips for the DoD and involvement in two other Pentagon chip R&D efforts, the company’s CEO is expected to have a conflict-free and secure standing, especially concerning rival nations.

This makes the depth of Tan’s ties to Chinese military-linked firms a potential liability, not just reputationally, but operationally. Even though it is not illegal to invest in Chinese military-linked firms, provided they are not on the U.S. Treasury’s Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, the political and strategic ramifications are significant.


Intel, Tan, and the SEC Conflict Protocol

In response to the report, Intel declined to comment specifically on Tan’s investments, only stating that he had submitted a director and officers questionnaire required by the SEC to disclose potential conflicts. They emphasized that any such issues are “handled appropriately” according to regulations.

However, neither Tan’s venture capital firm Walden International nor Intel’s board of directors (except three members) responded to Reuters’ requests for comment. This lack of transparency has further fueled skepticism about whether the company is addressing the situation proactively.


Polarized Reactions from Industry and Analysts

The tech and investor community appears divided over Tan’s suitability to lead Intel.

Critics, such as Andrew King of Bastille Ventures, argue that someone with such deep Chinese entanglements is “unqualified to lead a U.S. strategic defense supplier”. King underlined the national security dimensions, stating that Intel’s connection to America’s intelligence and military landscape demands an uncompromised leadership profile.

On the other hand, voices like Bernstein analyst Stacey Rasgon have defended the appointment, calling Tan a legendary figure in the VC community whose experience in global startups could help Intel innovate and return to form amid growing global chip competition.


Prior Government Attention and Investigations

The U.S. House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in a February 2024 report, flagged at least six investments by Walden worth $161 million in firms connected to China’s military. These figures further validate the scale and seriousness of Tan’s exposure to China’s defense ecosystem.


Is Intel’s Leadership Compromised?

The real question that now emerges is this: Can Intel remain a trusted defense partner of the U.S. while being led by someone with such a dense history of investments in China, including in sanctioned or sensitive entities?

While there is no legal breach confirmed, the optics and strategic implications cannot be overlooked. Intel, already battling global competition and striving to regain technological supremacy over TSMC and Samsung, may now find its reputation and government contracts under greater scrutiny.

If Tan has indeed divested, greater transparency and disclosures will be crucial in restoring confidence among U.S. investors and policymakers. The silence from Intel’s board only raises more concerns about whether appropriate internal diligence has been done.


The Global Stakes for Intel and America

The chip race is not just about market dominance—it’s about global tech sovereignty and national defense. As China intensifies its semiconductor self-reliance and the U.S. government pours billions into reshoring chip manufacturing, the leadership of Intel holds immense geopolitical significance.

Tan’s deep-rooted ties to China, even if historical, will continue to cast a shadow on Intel’s strategic narrative until clear, verified disassociation from PLA-linked entities is established.

For now, the spotlight remains sharply on Lip-Bu Tan, as both the media and policymakers watch closely for Intel’s next moves.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Aten Papers & Foam.


Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.


Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.

Related News
onlyfans leakedonlyfan leaksonlyfans leaked videos