Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian Lists Conditions to End War With US Amid Rising Middle East Tension
K N Mishra
12/Mar/2026
What's covered under the Article:
-
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian outlines key conditions for ending the Iran US war, including recognition of Iran’s rights, financial reparations and global guarantees against future attacks.
-
The conflict intensified after the US and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure, triggering missile attacks across the region.
-
Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia and Oman are pushing diplomatic efforts to end the war as oil prices surge and shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz face disruptions.
The ongoing Iran US war news has entered a new phase as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated the country’s stance on how the conflict could come to an end. Speaking amid escalating tensions in West Asia, Pezeshkian made it clear that Iran is willing to move toward de-escalation, but only if specific demands are fulfilled by the United States and its allies.
In a statement shared after discussions with international leaders, Pezeshkian stressed that Iran remains committed to peace in the region, yet the responsibility for ending the conflict lies with those who initiated it. His remarks have quickly become a major development in the latest Iran US conflict latest news, especially as the war continues to disrupt global markets, shipping routes and diplomatic relations.
Masoud Pezeshkian’s Key Conditions to End the War
According to the Iranian president, the only way to end the war is through a framework that recognises Iran’s rights and prevents future aggression. Pezeshkian stated that the country would consider de-escalation only if three major conditions are fulfilled.
First, Iran’s legitimate rights must be recognised by the international community. Tehran argues that it has been unfairly targeted despite maintaining that its defence and nuclear activities are within its sovereign rights.
Second, Iran has demanded financial reparations for damages caused by military attacks carried out during the conflict. Iranian leaders say the strikes have caused significant destruction to infrastructure and military facilities.
Third, Pezeshkian emphasised the need for firm international guarantees that the United States and Israel will not launch further attacks on Iran in the future.
The Iranian president wrote that recognising Iran’s rights, paying reparations and providing international guarantees against aggression are the only realistic path to ending the conflict.
These statements have added a new dimension to the Iran peace conditions with US debate that has dominated international discussions in recent weeks.
Iran Says It Is Not Seeking a Ceasefire
Despite the willingness to consider a political resolution, Iranian leaders have clarified that they are not actively seeking a ceasefire at this stage.
Senior Iranian political figure Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who previously served as a commander in the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, stated that Iran believes the aggressor must face consequences.
According to him, the attacks on Iran cannot simply be ignored without accountability. He argued that the conflict should continue until the parties responsible for the aggression are punished and deterred from launching similar attacks in the future.
This firm stance has intensified the Iran US conflict latest news, as neither side currently appears ready to step back from the confrontation.
Operation Epic Fury: The Trigger Behind the Conflict
The present crisis began after the United States and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury on February 28. The military campaign followed weeks of rising tensions, diplomatic failures and large-scale troop movements across the region.
Operation Epic Fury news quickly dominated global headlines as the strikes targeted several strategic locations inside Iran. These included military installations, missile facilities and key infrastructure connected to Iran’s defence system.
One of the most dramatic developments during the opening phase of the operation was the reported death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s long-time Supreme Leader. His death created immediate political shockwaves across the country and the broader region.
However, despite the intensity of the military campaign, the United States and Israel have not succeeded in forcing a regime change in Iran.
Mojtaba Khamenei Becomes the New Supreme Leader
Following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, leadership in Iran shifted rapidly to his son Mojtaba Khamenei, who has now assumed the role of Supreme Leader.
The appointment has drawn global attention because Mojtaba is widely considered a hardline political figure with strong influence over Iran’s security institutions.
Many Western governments initially believed that the leadership vacuum created by the death of the previous Supreme Leader could weaken the Iranian regime. However, recent developments suggest that Mojtaba Khamenei has consolidated power quickly and remains firmly in control of the country.
This has complicated the strategic calculations of the United States and its allies.
US Military Objectives in the War
When the conflict began, Washington outlined four major objectives for the military campaign against Iran.
The first objective was nuclear neutralisation, which involved destroying Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities and preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons.
The second goal was missile degradation, aiming to eliminate Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities and prevent the rebuilding of its missile industry.
The third objective focused on naval annihilation, which meant disabling the Iranian navy to ensure safe international shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
The final objective was proxy containment, targeting Iran’s ability to support allied militant groups across the Middle East, including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthi movement.
While the United States has claimed progress in some of these areas, analysts say not all strategic goals have been achieved.
Trump’s Mixed Signals About Ending the War
Amid the continuing conflict, US President Donald Trump has delivered mixed messages regarding the timeline for ending the war.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that the military campaign is progressing faster than expected and that the United States has already inflicted severe damage on Iran’s military capabilities.
He has even stated that there is “practically nothing left to target” in Iran, suggesting that the operation has largely achieved its objectives.
However, despite these statements, the United States has not announced a clear timeline for ending the conflict.
At the same time, Trump has strongly criticised the appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as Iran’s Supreme Leader, arguing that the new leadership is unacceptable to Washington.
Global Economic Impact of the Iran US War
Beyond military developments, the Iran US war news is also having a major impact on the global economy.
One of the biggest concerns is the disruption of shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime passage through which nearly 20 percent of the world’s oil supply normally flows.
Iranian attacks on regional infrastructure and shipping vessels have caused significant instability in global energy markets.
As a result, oil and natural gas prices have surged, creating economic pressure for countries that depend heavily on energy imports.
This volatility has made the conflict a global concern far beyond the Middle East.
Gulf States Push for Peace Efforts
Countries across the Gulf Cooperation Council are increasingly worried about the consequences of the conflict.
Nations such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman depend heavily on stable oil markets and uninterrupted maritime trade.
The ongoing conflict threatens both of these economic pillars.
In recent days, several Gulf governments have reportedly increased diplomatic outreach to Tehran. Their goal is to encourage Iran to reduce missile and drone attacks and help stabilise the situation in the region.
Diplomatic sources say that Saudi Arabia and Oman are playing particularly active roles in mediation efforts.
These initiatives aim to prevent further escalation and ensure that the Strait of Hormuz remains open for global shipping.
Rising Regional Tensions
Despite these diplomatic efforts, tensions across the Middle East remain extremely high.
Military operations continue on multiple fronts, and both sides appear determined to maintain pressure on each other.
At the same time, the global community is watching closely to see whether Iran’s demands for guarantees and reparations could become part of a future negotiation framework.
International observers believe that any potential peace agreement would require complex negotiations involving multiple global powers, including Russia, China and European nations.
Conclusion
The latest Iran US war news highlights the growing complexity of the conflict in West Asia. With Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian demanding recognition of Iran’s rights, financial reparations and international guarantees, the path to peace remains uncertain.
While the United States claims significant military progress under Operation Epic Fury, the Iranian leadership has shown no signs of surrendering or accepting a quick ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Gulf states continue pushing diplomatic efforts as rising oil prices and disrupted shipping threaten regional economic stability.
As the Iran US conflict latest news continues to unfold, the world remains focused on whether diplomatic negotiations can eventually replace military confrontation and bring an end to one of the most dangerous geopolitical crises in recent years.
Join our Telegram Channel for Latest News and Regular Updates.
Start your Mutual Fund Journey by Opening Free Account in Asset Plus.
Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.
Related News
Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice, investment advice, or trading recommendations.
Trading in stocks, forex, commodities, cryptocurrencies, or any other financial instruments involves high risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices can fluctuate rapidly, and there is a possibility of losing part or all of your invested capital.
We do not guarantee any profits, returns, or outcomes from the use of our website, services, or tools. Past performance is not indicative of future results.You are solely responsible for your investment and trading decisions. Before making any financial commitment, it is strongly recommended to consult with a qualified financial advisor or do your own research.
By accessing or using this website, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to this disclaimer. The website owners, partners, or affiliates shall not be held liable for any direct or indirect loss or damage arising from the use of information, tools, or services provided here.