The story of India’s freedom and early years of independence is incomplete without acknowledging the dynamic, and often tense, relationship between Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Both stalwarts of the Congress Party, their ideological and administrative differences shaped India’s formative political years. While Nehru went on to become India’s first Prime Minister, Patel’s role in unifying India by integrating princely states is still considered unparalleled.

However, behind the formal façade of unity, the two leaders disagreed on several critical matters, ranging from foreign policy and security to administration and religious issues. These differences, sometimes bordering on personal hostility, have come to light through first-hand accounts and historical documentation.

Disagreement Over Hyderabad and Nehru’s Outburst

In April 1948, when the Indian Army withdrew from Hyderabad, chaos followed under the Nizam’s rule. Qasim Rizvi and the Razakars began unleashing terror, mostly targeting the Hindu population. Sardar Patel, then the Home Minister, strongly advocated military intervention to stop the bloodshed and enforce law and order.

At a Cabinet meeting, Patel suggested deploying the army. Nehru, uncharacteristically, lost his temper and accused Patel of being “a total communalist”, dismissing his proposal outright. This confrontation led Patel to walk out of the meeting and cease communications with Nehru, refusing to attend further Cabinet meetings for a time. It was a pivotal moment that showcased the depth of mistrust and ideological differences between them.

Clashes on North-East Administration

Another major area of contention was the handling of India’s North-East region. Patel was strictly against Nehru’s idea of placing the region under the Ministry of External Affairs, treating it as separate from the Indian mainland. Patel foresaw the consequences—alienation of the local population and potential secessionist tendencies.

Unfortunately, Nehru went ahead with his policy, forming the Indian Frontier Administrative Service (IFAS). The recruits, although elite in educational background, lacked administrative acumen, leading to poor governance and the eventual growth of insurgent movements in Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, and Assam’s hills.

Patel’s concerns, ignored at the time, proved prophetic, as these areas saw unrest for decades.

A Cold Shoulder in Death: Nehru’s Actions Post Patel’s Demise

One of the most telling illustrations of Nehru’s personal animosity comes from the account of M.K.K. Nayar, a senior civil servant during that era. Upon Patel’s death in Bombay, Nehru issued two unusual orders:

• The Cadillac car used by Patel was to be returned immediately to the Foreign Ministry.

• Officers who wanted to attend Patel’s funeral had to travel at their own expense.

V.P. Menon, Patel’s close aide, discreetly arranged tickets for willing officers using his personal funds. This act, when discovered by Nehru, angered him further, exposing a deeper level of resentment.

Nehru’s Treatment of V.P. Menon: A National Disservice

V.P. Menon, one of India’s most brilliant administrators and Patel’s right-hand man in integrating over 500 princely states, was systematically marginalized by Nehru after Patel’s passing. Menon was briefly appointed as Governor of Orissa but soon after, he was edged out from any significant role in the government.

According to Nayar, Nehru could not stand hearing Menon’s name or acknowledging his contributions, and over time, his legacy was deliberately erased from public memory by political circles keen on glorifying Nehru alone.

The RSS and Sardar Patel: A Truth Often Distorted

A common refrain among RSS critics is that Sardar Patel banned the organisation after Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination. However, the truth is more nuanced. On 27 February 1948, a month after Gandhi’s death, Patel wrote to Nehru, stating that no evidence was found to link the RSS with the assassination.

Patel’s decision to ban the RSS was made under intense pressure, largely stemming from Nehru’s insistence. Despite the ban, Patel maintained that the organisation had no proven hand in the murder. Eventually, when no charges stood ground, the ban was lifted on 11 July 1949.

In his memoir, Dwarika Prasad Mishra, who served as Home Minister of the Central Provinces, noted that Gandhi’s assassination was politically exploited to discredit and bring down rivals—clearly pointing at how Nehru leveraged the tragedy for political ends.

Can the Congress Truly Claim Sardar Patel’s Legacy?

The recent resolution by the Congress Working Committee (CWC) in Ahmedabad to claim Sardar Patel’s legacy appears ironical in light of historical evidence. Patel was often sidelined, disrespected, and his contributions diluted by the very party he served loyally.

The political marginalization of Patel during Nehru’s tenure, both in life and after his death, raises serious questions about the Congress Party’s commitment to his vision and values. It wasn’t until recent years that national recognition—like the Statue of Unity—brought Patel’s legacy back into mainstream discourse, largely driven by non-Congress leadership.

A Legacy of Division and Nation-Building

Sardar Patel’s contributions to India’s unity are unquestionably monumental. His ability to persuade, negotiate, and sometimes coerce princely states into acceding to the Indian Union prevented what could have been a Balkanized subcontinent. However, his contributions were often under-acknowledged due to Nehru’s dominance in the political and historical narrative.

The uneasy relationship between Nehru and Patel highlights the complexities of power, ideology, and leadership in post-independence India. Patel’s pragmatic and nationalist approach often clashed with Nehru’s idealistic and sometimes utopian vision.

Conclusion: Revisiting Historical Truths

History often gets written by those in power, and in India’s case, Nehru’s towering legacy has overshadowed many important figures. But as personal memoirs, government records, and scholarly research emerge, the real story of Sardar Patel’s dedication, foresight, and marginalization is gaining clarity.

Recognizing these truths isn’t about rewriting history but about acknowledging all contributors to India’s freedom and unity with honesty. Sardar Patel deserves a place in Indian memory not just as a loyal Congressman, but as the Iron Man who built modern India, often despite the odds within his own party.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Aten Papers & Foam.

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.

Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.