Senior Congress leader K.C. Venugopal addressed the media and parliamentary observers on Thursday, asserting that he and the party are not intimidated by the Substantive Motion recently raised in the Lok Sabha. This motion is linked to statements made by the Leader of Opposition during the Budget discussion held on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, much of which was subsequently expunged from the official records.

Context of the Substantive Motion

A Substantive Motion in the Indian Parliament is a formal mechanism that allows members to raise serious matters of discussion or censure, often requiring thorough debate and voting procedures. In this instance, the motion reportedly relates to comments made by the Opposition during the Budget debate, signaling heightened parliamentary scrutiny of statements that challenge government policies or actions.

The expunction of remarks during parliamentary sessions is not unusual in India, particularly when statements are deemed unparliamentary or controversial. However, the linkage of this motion to those expunged remarks has drawn attention, leading to questions about the Congress leadership’s response.

Venugopal’s Response

Addressing these developments, K.C. Venugopal emphasized that neither he nor his colleagues are intimidated by procedural motions in Parliament. He noted that the Congress party views such motions as part of the democratic process, allowing for debate, accountability, and engagement across political lines.

Venugopal further clarified that the party’s positions and criticisms during the Budget debate were focused on substantive policy issues affecting the nation, including economic priorities, fiscal responsibility, and social welfare. He maintained that Parliamentary democracy accommodates dissent, and the Congress will continue to exercise its rights robustly within legislative procedures.

Political Implications

This development comes amid heightened scrutiny of parliamentary debates and Opposition remarks in the wake of budget discussions. By asserting confidence in the face of a Substantive Motion, Venugopal sends a clear signal of Congress’ resolve to engage with government policies without fear of procedural challenges.

Political analysts note that such motions, while formally significant, often serve as symbolic gestures to signal disapproval or prompt debate rather than being punitive. Congress’ stance, as articulated by Venugopal, reflects a strategic approach to maintain visibility and credibility in Parliament while asserting the party’s legislative rights.

Expunged Remarks and Parliamentary Procedure

Much of what was said by the Leader of Opposition in the Budget debate was expunged, a procedure used when remarks are deemed unparliamentary or outside acceptable decorum. Despite the removal of these statements from official records, their political and procedural implications remain, particularly when linked to motions that question conduct or accountability in Parliament.

Venugopal stressed that Congress’ advocacy and opposition are rooted in policy concerns and not personal attacks, reiterating that the party will continue constructive criticism while respecting parliamentary norms. He also highlighted the need for Parliament to address public policy matters transparently and without intimidation, ensuring that the democratic process remains robust.

Looking Ahead

The Substantive Motion may require formal consideration, debate, or voting in the coming sessions. Venugopal’s statements signal that Congress is prepared to face these challenges without retreating from its positions. Analysts suggest that such confrontations underscore the dynamic nature of parliamentary democracy in India, where procedural instruments like motions can coexist with spirited political debate.

By framing the issue as one of procedural normalcy rather than threat, K.C. Venugopal reinforces the narrative that Congress views Parliament as a forum for constructive engagement, even when facing motions triggered by contentious remarks.

Conclusion

K.C. Venugopal’s remarks reaffirm Congress’ confidence and resilience in Parliament. Linking the Substantive Motion to Opposition statements during the Budget debate, he highlighted the party’s commitment to democratic principles, accountability, and open debate.

While the motion may spark further discussion in parliamentary committees and sessions, Venugopal’s stance indicates that Congress will continue to engage actively and assertively, emphasizing policy critique and public interest over procedural intimidation. The coming days are likely to witness a careful balance of debate, scrutiny, and legislative strategy as Parliament addresses both procedural and substantive issues raised during the Budget discussion.

Join our Telegram Channel for Latest News and Regular Updates.

Start your Mutual Fund Journey  by Opening Free Account in Asset Plus.

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.