Nepal’s political crisis, which has already seen the ousting of the Prime Minister, violent protests, and the intervention of the army, is now threatening to isolate the country internationally. Leaders across the political spectrum are calling for urgent engagement with global powers, particularly India, the United States, and China, to ensure that Nepal does not face diplomatic and economic isolation during this turbulent period.

At the forefront of this appeal is Bimalendra Nidhi, Vice-President of the Nepali Congress, who has urged Nepal’s closest partners to extend reassurance and constructive engagement rather than distance themselves from the country’s instability.

Nepal’s plea to international partners

Speaking to the media, Nidhi stated that Nepal’s fragile situation requires global reassurance. “India, the U.S., and China should assure Nepal that the country will not face international isolation because of the current political situation,” he said.

His remarks reflect growing concerns among Nepal’s political class that ongoing instability, violent protests, and the uncertain transition of power could weaken foreign confidence and discourage international cooperation.

Background of the crisis

The youth-led Gen Z protests have dramatically reshaped Nepal’s political landscape. Anger over corruption, unemployment, and government failures culminated in violent clashes in Kathmandu, with the parliament building set ablaze and the Prime Minister forced to resign.

The Nepalese Army has since stepped in to restore order, but fears of a military-backed government and prolonged instability have alarmed both domestic and international observers.

In this uncertain environment, international support is vital to ensure that Nepal’s economy, democracy, and diplomatic ties remain intact.

Why India, the US, and China matter most

Nepal’s geopolitical position, sandwiched between India and China, makes it uniquely sensitive to foreign influence. India has long been Nepal’s closest partner, providing trade, transit routes, and cultural ties. China, in recent years, has expanded its presence in Nepal through investments linked to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

The United States, while geographically distant, has played a role in supporting Nepal’s democratic transition and development programs. Its stance on Nepal’s crisis could shape how Western nations approach Kathmandu in the weeks to come.

Nepali leaders fear that if these three major powers adopt a “wait and watch” approach or express reluctance to engage due to instability, Nepal could find itself cut off from critical international cooperation, aid, and investment.

Risks of isolation

For Nepal, isolation would be devastating. The country is still recovering from the economic shocks of the pandemic, sluggish growth, and declining remittances. Political instability has already discouraged foreign investment, and worsening ties with key partners could deepen the crisis.

Diplomatic isolation could also embolden the military to extend its role in governance, raising questions about the survival of Nepal’s democratic institutions.

Call for dialogue and stability

Nidhi and other leaders have emphasized the need for Nepal to demonstrate stability, engage in dialogue, and reassure international partners. “The situation requires immediate consensus among political forces to show the world that Nepal is committed to democracy and stability,” he said.

At the same time, he urged India, the U.S., and China to see Nepal’s crisis not as a weakness but as an opportunity to support its democratic journey.

Possible role of Sushila Karki

As the name of Sushila Karki, former Chief Justice of Nepal, gains traction as a potential transitional leader, her reputation could help restore international confidence. Known for her integrity and independence, Karki could act as a bridge figure to reassure both Nepali citizens and foreign governments that the transition will remain civilian-led.

If she takes charge, international partners may be more willing to engage, seeing her as a neutral, reform-oriented figure capable of steering Nepal toward elections.

India’s perspective

For India, Nepal’s stability is a matter of strategic necessity. The two countries share an open border, deep cultural ties, and economic interdependence. Political chaos in Kathmandu often has direct spillover effects in northern India, from cross-border migration to trade disruptions.

New Delhi has not yet made an official statement on the latest developments, but experts believe India will prioritize keeping Nepal engaged within its strategic orbit, even as China continues to expand its influence.

China’s interests

Beijing, too, has stakes in Nepal’s stability. Over the past decade, China has invested heavily in Nepal’s infrastructure, building highways, hydropower plants, and cross-border trade routes. Instability threatens these projects and could slow China’s Belt and Road plans.

China may therefore prefer to back a consensus civilian government rather than see Nepal fall into prolonged unrest.

The US approach

The United States has traditionally supported Nepal’s democracy and development through aid programs and diplomatic engagement. Washington has called for restraint and respect for democratic processes, but has yet to indicate a clear roadmap of support during the crisis.

Nepali leaders are urging Washington not to disengage but to stand firm with Kathmandu, signaling that democratic partners remain invested in Nepal’s success.

The way forward

Nepal’s youth-led uprising has brought the country to a crossroads. While the crisis has created uncertainty, it also provides an opportunity for Nepal’s political class to reset its governance model and for international partners to strengthen their support.

If India, the U.S., and China step up engagement, Nepal could avoid isolation and move toward a peaceful transition under civilian leadership. But if the crisis deepens without global reassurance, Nepal risks sliding further into instability, with dangerous consequences for its democracy and economy.

Conclusion

Nepal’s leaders are acutely aware of the risks of being cut off diplomatically during a moment of intense domestic upheaval. By calling on India, the U.S., and China to actively support the country, they hope to prevent isolation and keep Nepal firmly on the path of democratic transition.

Whether these powers respond with proactive engagement or cautious distance will play a decisive role in shaping Nepal’s political and economic future.

The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Karbonsteel Engineering, Taurian MPS, L. T. Elevator, Galaxy Medicare, Airfloa Rail Technology, Dev Accelerator, Jay Ambe Supermarkets, Urban Company, Shringar House of Mangalsutra, .

The Current active IPO are Nilachal Carbo Metalicks, Krupalu Metals, Vashishtha Luxury Fashion, Sharvaya Metals, Vigor Plast India, Austere Systems.

Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.