Rajnath Singh declares Naxalism confined to few districts, warns of strong anti-terror action

NOOR MOHMMED

    05/Jul/2025

  • Defence Minister Rajnath Singh claims Naxalism is now restricted to just five or six districts across India.

  • Vows India will respond strongly to any terror attacks like Pahalgam with equal force and determination.

  • Highlights government’s success in containing internal security threats while warning adversaries against mischief.

Rajnath Singh Asserts Naxalism Confined to Few Districts, Warns Strong Response to Terrorism

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh made a significant statement about India’s internal security situation, declaring that Naxalism, once a widespread threat across large swathes of the country, is now confined to just five or six districts.

Speaking to the media and public during his visit, Singh took the opportunity to highlight the government’s success in tackling Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) while also issuing a stern warning to terrorists in the wake of the Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir.

He vowed that India will respond with equal strength to any such acts of terrorism in the future.


Naxalism: From Widespread Insurgency to Contained Threat

Naxalism has long been one of India’s most complex internal security challenges.

  • Emerging in the late 1960s in West Bengal’s Naxalbari village, the movement expanded over decades into an ideological insurgency, attracting disaffected tribal populations and poor farmers.

  • At its peak, the “Red Corridor” stretched across parts of Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Bihar, Maharashtra, and West Bengal.

  • It posed not only a military threat but also a developmental challenge, as Maoist groups exploited poverty, land disputes, and tribal marginalisation.

However, Rajnath Singh emphasised that through consistent security operations and development initiatives, the insurgency has been significantly weakened.

“Today, Naxalism has been confined to just five or six districts,” he said.

This claim, if validated by security data, would represent a major achievement for Indian counter-insurgency efforts.


Government Strategy: Security and Development

Successive governments have recognised that military force alone cannot solve the Naxal problem.

Key elements of India’s anti-Naxal strategy include:

  • Coordinated Security Operations: Deployment of specialised forces like the CRPF’s CoBRA units, state police special forces, and joint operations across state borders.

  • Intelligence Sharing: Improved coordination through structures like the Unified Command in affected states.

  • Infrastructure Development: Construction of roads, schools, hospitals, and telecom networks in remote areas.

  • Surrender and Rehabilitation: Encouraging Maoist cadres to lay down arms with the promise of monetary incentives, housing, and employment.

  • Community Policing and Trust Building: Training local police to be more sensitive to tribal issues and building relationships with local communities.

This dual approach—of security pressure and addressing root causes—has helped reduce Maoist influence in many traditional strongholds.


Remaining Challenges in Core Areas

Despite these successes, pockets of resistance remain.

  • Forested, hilly regions with poor connectivity still serve as hideouts for Maoist leaders.

  • Areas in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar region, parts of Jharkhand, and certain districts in Odisha and Maharashtra continue to see sporadic violence.

  • Maoist attacks on security forces, infrastructure, and local political figures have not ended entirely.

By acknowledging the continued presence in five or six districts, Rajnath Singh struck a realistic note—celebrating progress while admitting there is work left to do.


Political Messaging: Showcasing Success Before Elections

Rajnath Singh’s comments also serve an important political purpose.

  • By presenting Naxalism as nearly defeated, the government can highlight its internal security record.

  • It reassures voters that the BJP-led government has delivered on promises to make India safer.

  • Such statements are particularly important before elections, when security is a major campaign theme.

It is a classic tactic in politics worldwide: demonstrating success in reducing terrorist threats and insurgencies to build public confidence.


Warning on Terrorism: The Pahalgam Attack Reference

While talking about Naxalism, Singh also issued a clear warning about terrorism, referencing the recent Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir.

  • In that attack, terrorists targeted security forces, killing and injuring personnel.

  • The attack underscored the ongoing security challenges in Kashmir, despite improvements over the years.

Singh said:

“If any such mischief takes place in future, we will give a befitting reply with the same strength.”

This was a direct message to terror groups and their alleged sponsors across the border, widely understood to mean Pakistan-based militant outfits.


India’s Broader Anti-Terror Doctrine

India’s stance on terrorism has hardened over the years, especially after:

  • The 2008 Mumbai attacks.

  • The 2016 Uri attack, after which India conducted surgical strikes across the Line of Control.

  • The 2019 Pulwama attack, which led to the Balakot airstrikes in Pakistan.

Singh’s warning fits into this doctrine of pre-emptive and retaliatory strikes.

India’s message: Terror attacks will not go unpunished.


Defence Minister’s Role in Shaping Security Policy

As Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh plays a crucial role in:

  • Overseeing armed forces readiness.

  • Coordinating with the Ministry of Home Affairs on internal security.

  • Representing India’s tough stance in international forums.

His statements carry weight because they signal government policy, not just personal opinion.


Opposition Critique and Questions

While the government celebrates these gains, opposition parties and some security analysts have raised questions:

  • Are the statistics accurate? Are Maoist groups lying low only to regroup later?

  • Is the government paying enough attention to tribal rights and land disputes that fuel discontent?

  • In Kashmir, despite improvements, why do attacks like Pahalgam keep happening?

These questions ensure that while victory is claimed, there is continued accountability.


Security Forces’ Sacrifices

Singh’s speech also indirectly honoured the thousands of security personnel who have fought the Maoist insurgency:

  • CRPF, BSF, and state police forces have lost hundreds of personnel in ambushes and IED blasts.

  • Army units have also been deployed for intelligence and support in some regions.

  • Their efforts have broken supply chains, captured leaders, and restored normalcy to many villages.

This human cost is a reminder that counter-insurgency victories are hard-won.


Balancing Security and Human Rights

A frequent challenge for governments fighting insurgencies is avoiding civilian alienation.

  • Heavy-handed security measures can backfire, creating resentment.

  • Singh’s government has tried to balance firmness with development, though critics argue more needs to be done.

  • Judicial oversight, media scrutiny, and civil society monitoring remain essential.


Regional Cooperation and Cross-Border Issues

Naxalism is largely an internal issue, but terrorism in Kashmir has cross-border dimensions.

  • Singh’s warning on the Pahalgam attack can also be seen as a message to Pakistan.

  • India has repeatedly accused Pakistan of harbouring and supporting terrorists.

  • Diplomatic efforts continue to pressurise Islamabad to crack down on these groups.


Future Outlook: Sustaining Gains

Experts agree that reducing Naxalism to five or six districts is an achievement, but the final stage is the hardest.

  • Eliminating hardcore leadership requires precise intelligence and local support.

  • Winning over communities demands sustained development and justice.

  • Preventing recruitment of new cadres depends on addressing poverty, land rights, and corruption.

Similarly, in Kashmir and other areas affected by terrorism, vigilance remains essential.


Conclusion: A Complex Security Landscape

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s statement serves several purposes:

  • Celebrating real, measurable progress against Naxalism.

  • Reassuring the public of the government’s commitment to security.

  • Warning terrorists—and their sponsors—that India will not tolerate attacks.

  • Positioning the government as strong on internal security, a critical theme in electoral politics.

But the reality remains complex:

  • Pockets of Maoist resistance will require continued operations and negotiations.

  • Terror threats—especially in Jammu and Kashmir—will demand constant readiness and strategic clarity.

  • Balancing security with human rights and development will be the true test of success.

As India prepares for upcoming elections, expect security achievements and challenges to be at the forefront of political discourse.


The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Asston PharmaceuticalsCFF Fluid ControlSmarten Power SystemsGlen IndustriesTravel Food ServicesAnthem BiosciencesChemkart India.


The Current active IPO are Meta InfotechHappy Square Outsourcing ServicesCryogenic OGS.


Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.


Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.

Rajnath Singh’s words are both a report card on government progress and a promise of unrelenting vigilance in the face of evolving threats.

Related News
onlyfans leakedonlyfan leaksonlyfans leaked videos