What's covered under the Article

The investigation into the Tiger Shroff firing case has taken an important turn after the Mumbai Police Crime Branch recovered two firearms and 10 live rounds from Surat in Gujarat. Officials said the weapons were seized during the ongoing investigation into the firing incident targeting Bollywood actor Tiger Shroff in Mumbai. Investigators suspect that the recovered firearms may have been used by the accused during the attack, although their connection to the incident remains subject to further investigation.

The recovery is a significant development because it may help investigators establish the sequence of events, examine the weapons allegedly used during the shooting, and collect additional evidence against the suspects. The Mumbai Police has been investigating the case since the incident near Pushpa Park in the Juhu area on October 18, 2026. According to police information, around seven rounds were fired during the attack. Five bullets reportedly struck the BMW in which the actor was travelling, while two shots missed. The firing also left the actor's driver and another person nearby injured.

The latest recovery in Surat comes after the police arrested three accused at Kota railway station in Rajasthan. Investigators are also examining whether other people helped plan or carry out the attack. The alleged role of gangster Anil Pandit, who has been named as a wanted accused in the case, is also under scrutiny.

Two firearms and 10 live cartridges recovered in Surat

According to officials, a team of the Mumbai Police Crime Branch recovered two firearms and 10 live cartridges from Surat, Gujarat, as part of the investigation. The recovery was confirmed in an official statement issued during the course of the probe.

The seizure relates to DCB CID CR No. 143/26, registered under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, along with Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. These provisions form part of the legal framework under which the police are investigating the alleged offences and the possession or use of firearms.

Investigators believe the weapons could be connected to the shooting incident involving Tiger Shroff. However, the final link between the recovered firearms and the attack will depend on the findings of forensic examination and other evidence gathered during the investigation.

Firearms recovered during a criminal investigation are generally examined for identifying marks, fingerprints, and other material that may help establish how they were handled or used. Investigators may also compare the weapons with physical evidence collected from the crime scene. In a firing case, ballistic examination can help determine whether bullets or cartridge cases recovered from the scene are consistent with a particular firearm.

The recovery of 10 live rounds is also an important part of the investigation. The ammunition may provide further evidence about the weapons and the circumstances in which they were allegedly kept or transported. Police will need to establish where the firearms came from, who possessed them, and whether they were used during the attack.

At this stage, officials have described the weapons as likely to have been used by the accused. This means their suspected connection to the firing is still being examined. The seizure alone does not establish the guilt of any particular person, and the evidence must be assessed through the legal process.

What happened in the Tiger Shroff firing incident?

The case concerns a shooting incident reported near Pushpa Park in Mumbai's Juhu area on Sunday, October 18, 2026. According to the police account cited in reports, the attackers fired around seven rounds during the incident involving the vehicle in which Tiger Shroff was travelling.

Of the seven rounds reportedly fired, five hit the actor's BMW, while two missed. The firing caused injuries to the vehicle's driver and another person who was nearby. The incident prompted an investigation by the Mumbai Police, which began gathering evidence and tracking the suspects.

The attack has attracted attention because Tiger Shroff is a prominent Bollywood actor. The investigation is focused on establishing who carried out the firing, how the attack was planned, whether the suspects received assistance from others, and what motive may have been behind the incident.

Police are also examining the movements of the accused before and after the shooting. Investigators suspect that the attackers may have conducted reconnaissance, including gathering information about the actor's routine and movements. Such activity, if established through evidence, could help explain how the accused allegedly selected the location and time of the attack.

The authorities are expected to assess CCTV footage, witness accounts, technical evidence, and other material collected during the investigation. These sources may help reconstruct the events leading up to the shooting and the route allegedly taken by the attackers after the incident.

The recovery of the firearms in Surat adds another element to this investigation. If forensic analysis links the weapons to the bullets or cartridge cases connected with the incident, the findings could help strengthen the evidentiary record. If the examination does not establish such a link, investigators will need to consider the other available evidence to determine the weapons' relevance to the case.

Three accused arrested at Kota railway station

The Mumbai Police had earlier arrested three accused from the Kota railway station in Rajasthan. The arrests took place on Monday, October 19, according to the information reported in connection with the case.

The accused were reportedly traced to Kota after the police examined their movements following the firing incident. Investigators had also seized a motorcycle allegedly used by the suspects to escape. The bike was recovered from the Andheri station area in Mumbai on the same day as the arrests, according to the reported police account.

The three arrested individuals include a 17-year-old minor. The other two were identified as Hrithik Kumar, also known as Roshan, aged 22, and Rehan, aged 18. Hrithik Kumar reportedly hails from Begusarai in Bihar, while Rehan is from Sonipat in Haryana.

The involvement of a minor means that the legal procedures applicable to juveniles will be relevant to the investigation and any subsequent proceedings concerning that individual. Authorities must follow the applicable legal safeguards while investigating allegations involving a person below the age of 18.

The police are examining the alleged roles of the three accused and the extent to which each may have participated in the planning, execution, or escape connected with the attack. The investigation will need to establish the specific actions attributed to each individual rather than treating the suspects' alleged involvement as identical.

The arrests were an important step in the investigation, but the recovery of the firearms may provide additional evidence. Investigators will seek to determine whether the weapons were in the possession of the arrested individuals, whether other people supplied or concealed them, and whether the firearms can be connected to the shooting through forensic findings.

The police are also looking into whether more people were involved in supporting the alleged attackers. Reports have indicated that several other individuals were apprehended in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Haryana as the investigation expanded. Their precise roles, if any, will have to be established through evidence.

Police suspect the attack was planned in advance

One of the key aspects of the Tiger Shroff firing case is the possibility that the attack was planned rather than carried out spontaneously. According to the police account, investigators suspect that the accused conducted a detailed recce before the shooting.

A recce is the process of visiting or observing a location to gather information before an operation. In a criminal investigation, evidence of reconnaissance may include repeated visits to a location, monitoring a person's movements, examining routes, or collecting information about a routine.

Police suspect that the accused tracked Tiger Shroff's movements, including aspects of his weekly routine, before carrying out the attack. If investigators establish this through reliable evidence, it could help them understand how the alleged attackers selected the location and prepared for the incident.

The reported escape route is also under examination. Police believe the accused fled along a pre-planned route after the firing, travelling through the SV Road corridor via Vile Parle and Andheri. Investigators may compare this account with CCTV footage, vehicle movements, witness statements, and other records to establish the route taken.

The motorcycle allegedly used by the suspects is another important piece of evidence. Its recovery could help investigators examine its ownership, use, movements, and possible links to the accused. Police may also investigate whether the motorcycle was arranged specifically for the alleged crime or used for other purposes before the incident.

Establishing whether the attack was planned in advance may be important for understanding the alleged roles of the individuals involved. Investigators will need to examine communications, travel details, financial links, and other evidence wherever legally available and relevant to the case.

However, the suspicion of advance planning must be distinguished from a final finding. Police investigations involve testing different possibilities and collecting evidence. The conclusions reached by investigators must ultimately be assessed through the legal process.

Alleged gangster Anil Pandit under police scanner

The investigation has also brought the name of Anil Pandit into focus. Mumbai Police has named Pandit as a wanted accused in connection with the case. He is described in reports as an alleged associate of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang.

According to the reported account, Pandit had claimed responsibility for targeting the actor on October 18. Investigators are examining the claim and the circumstances surrounding it to determine whether it can be supported by independent evidence.

A claim of responsibility does not, by itself, establish who organised or carried out a crime. Police must investigate the source and credibility of such a claim and assess whether it matches the evidence collected from the crime scene, the suspects, and other relevant sources.

The alleged connection to the Lawrence Bishnoi gang is another line of inquiry. Investigators may seek to establish whether there were communications, instructions, financial arrangements, or other links between the arrested individuals and anyone suspected of directing the attack. Any such connection must be supported by evidence rather than assumptions based on an alleged association.

Police have not concluded the investigation merely by naming a wanted accused. The authorities will need to establish the alleged role of each person, identify any possible wider network, and determine whether others helped plan, finance, facilitate, or execute the attack.

The recovery of two firearms in Surat may be relevant to this part of the investigation if evidence establishes who supplied, possessed, or used them. Investigators will likely examine how the weapons reached the location where they were found and whether their movement can be linked to the suspects or any other individual under investigation.

The case therefore extends beyond the three people arrested in Kota. Police are examining whether the attack involved a wider chain of planning and assistance, while the status and alleged role of each person remain matters for the ongoing investigation.

Why the firearms recovery matters

The recovery of two firearms and 10 live rounds is important because physical evidence can help investigators test the accounts provided by suspects and witnesses. Statements alone may not be sufficient to establish what happened during a shooting. Weapons, ammunition, ballistic findings, and other material evidence can help build a clearer picture of the incident.

One of the main questions is whether the recovered firearms match the evidence from the scene. If bullets or cartridge cases were collected during the investigation, forensic experts may examine whether they are consistent with the recovered weapons. The results could help establish whether either firearm was used during the attack.

Another question concerns possession and movement. Investigators may examine where the weapons were found, how they were stored, and whether any evidence links them to the arrested accused or other people under investigation. Such details may help establish the chain of events before and after the shooting.

The 10 live rounds may also be examined as part of the evidence. Their presence does not, on its own, explain how many rounds were fired during the incident or establish who used the weapons. Investigators must assess the ammunition alongside the physical evidence, witness accounts, and other findings.

The recovery could also lead police to investigate the source of the firearms. Authorities may seek to establish whether the weapons were legally owned, illegally acquired, transferred between individuals, or concealed to avoid detection. The answers could be relevant to the investigation under the Arms Act.

At the same time, the seizure should not be treated as proof of guilt. A criminal case requires the evidence against each accused to be examined according to law. The forensic results and the overall investigation will determine the significance of the recovery.

Legal provisions under BNS and the Arms Act

The case has been registered under specified provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Arms Act. The police statement referred to Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act.

The BNS is India's principal criminal law framework that replaced the Indian Penal Code for offences covered by the new legislation. Section 109(1) concerns an attempt to murder. Section 3(5) addresses criminal acts carried out by several persons in furtherance of a common intention, where its legal requirements are met.

The Arms Act regulates matters involving firearms and ammunition, including specified restrictions and offences related to their possession, acquisition, or use. The relevance of the cited provisions will depend on the evidence collected and the facts established in the case.

The registration of a case under particular sections indicates the legal provisions the police are invoking during the investigation. It does not mean that the accused have been convicted. The prosecution must establish the required elements of any alleged offence through admissible evidence and the legal process.

In a case involving gunfire, investigators generally need to establish what happened, who was responsible, whether firearms were used, and whether the conduct falls within the relevant criminal provisions. Evidence may include forensic findings, witness statements, video footage, weapon recovery records, and other material collected lawfully.

The Arms Act provisions may be particularly relevant to the recovery of the two firearms and 10 live cartridges. Authorities will need to determine the circumstances in which the weapons and ammunition were possessed and whether the facts support any alleged offence under the applicable law.

The investigation may also involve determining whether the alleged attackers acted together and whether other people played a role. Such questions require evidence of the conduct and intention of the individuals concerned. Each allegation must be examined according to the legal standards applicable to the proceedings.

What investigators may examine next

With the weapons recovered in Surat, the next stage of the investigation is likely to focus on establishing their connection to the shooting and tracing their ownership or movement. The police have stated that the investigation remains underway, and further action will depend on the evidence gathered.

A key step will be the forensic examination of the firearms and ammunition. Investigators may compare the weapons with ballistic evidence from the incident, where available. The results could help determine whether the recovered firearms were used during the firing or whether they are connected to the case in another way.

Police may also continue examining the motorcycle allegedly used during the escape, the route taken by the accused, and their movements before and after October 18. CCTV footage and other records may help verify the timeline and identify possible meetings or interactions relevant to the investigation.

The authorities may also investigate how the accused allegedly learned about the actor's movements. If the suspected recce is supported by evidence, it may help establish how the attackers allegedly prepared for the incident. Investigators will need to determine whether the information was collected by the arrested individuals themselves or provided by other people.

Another area of inquiry is the possible involvement of individuals beyond the three arrested suspects. Police have reportedly apprehended several others in different states as part of the wider probe. Investigators will need to clarify whether those individuals are witnesses, suspects, or people whose activities require further examination. An apprehension or questioning does not by itself establish criminal involvement.

The alleged role of Anil Pandit will also remain a focus while he is listed as wanted in the case. Police will need to gather evidence to substantiate the allegations against him and establish whether there is any link between him, the arrested individuals, and the recovered weapons.

The investigation may result in further questioning, forensic analysis, the collection of additional records, and other lawful investigative steps. Any future arrests or charges will depend on the evidence and the decisions taken by the competent authorities.

Public safety and the importance of a thorough investigation

The firing incident has raised serious concerns because it involved gunshots near a public area and reportedly caused injuries to two people. Incidents involving firearms can put not only the intended target but also drivers, pedestrians, residents, and other bystanders at risk.

According to the reported details, five rounds struck the BMW carrying Tiger Shroff, while two missed. The injuries to the driver and a nearby person highlight how a shooting can affect people who may have no direct connection to the alleged target.

A thorough investigation is therefore important for establishing accountability and understanding whether the attack involved wider planning. Recovering the suspected firearms is one part of that process. Investigators must also establish the timeline, identify the people involved, and examine the evidence supporting each allegation.

The police must ensure that physical evidence is documented and handled appropriately so that its origin and relevance can be assessed. The chain of custody, forensic findings, and the reliability of other evidence may be important if the recovered items are presented during legal proceedings.

It is equally important that allegations are reported carefully. People named in an investigation should not be treated as guilty solely because they have been arrested, questioned, or described as wanted. The legal process must determine responsibility based on evidence.

For the same reason, claims about gang links, motives, or the identities of people directing an attack need to be verified. Investigators must establish whether such claims are supported by communications, witness accounts, forensic material, or other reliable evidence.

Tiger Shroff firing case: What is known so far?

The main developments in the case can be summarised through several key points. First, Mumbai Police Crime Branch officials have recovered two firearms and 10 live rounds from Surat, Gujarat. Investigators suspect the weapons may have been used during the firing incident, but their exact connection must be established through further examination.

Second, the shooting reportedly took place near Pushpa Park in Mumbai's Juhu area on October 18, 2026. Police said around seven rounds were fired, five of which struck the BMW carrying the actor. The incident reportedly injured the driver and another person nearby.

Third, three accused were arrested at Kota railway station in Rajasthan. They include a 17-year-old minor, 22-year-old Hrithik Kumar alias Roshan, and 18-year-old Rehan. Police are examining their alleged roles and whether others assisted them.

Fourth, investigators suspect that the attack was planned in advance and that the accused may have tracked the actor's movements. Police are also examining the alleged escape route through Vile Parle and Andheri and the motorcycle reportedly used by the suspects.

Finally, Anil Pandit has been named as a wanted accused, and his alleged association with the Lawrence Bishnoi gang is under scrutiny. The investigation is proceeding under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act.

These details represent the status of the case as reported on October 24, 2026. The police investigation is ongoing, and further findings may change or clarify the current understanding of the incident.

Conclusion

The recovery of two firearms and 10 live cartridges in Surat marks a significant development in the investigation into the Tiger Shroff firing case. The Mumbai Police Crime Branch is examining whether the weapons were used during the attack reported near Pushpa Park in Juhu on October 18.

The case already includes the arrest of three accused in Kota, the seizure of a motorcycle allegedly used in the escape, and an inquiry into suspected advance planning. Investigators are also examining the alleged role of Anil Pandit, who has been named as a wanted accused.

The next important steps will involve forensic examination of the recovered firearms, verification of the suspects' movements, and further investigation into the possible involvement of other people. Police will need to establish the source of the weapons, determine whether they match the evidence from the scene, and assess the role of each person under investigation.

Although the recovery may provide crucial evidence, it does not by itself settle the case. The findings must be considered alongside all other evidence, and responsibility must be established through the legal process. Mumbai Police has said the investigation is continuing and that further action will be taken as appropriate.

As the Tiger Shroff firing investigation progresses, the forensic findings and the evidence gathered from different locations may help authorities reconstruct the incident and determine how the attack was allegedly organised. For now, the recovery in Surat remains a key development in a case involving suspected firearms use, multiple accused, and an ongoing search for answers about the planning and execution of the shooting.