Trump sues JPMorgan for USD 5 billion, alleges political debanking

K N Mishra

    23/Jan/2026

What's covered under the Article:

  1. Donald Trump filed a USD 5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan, alleging political bias led to closure of his and his businesses’ accounts.

  2. JPMorgan denied the allegations, stating accounts were closed only due to legal or regulatory risks, not politics.

  3. The lawsuit highlights the broader debate over debanking, reputational risk, and political influence in US financial institutions.

Former US President Donald Trump has filed a high-profile USD 5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, alleging that the banking giant shut down several of his personal and business accounts for political reasons shortly after he left office in January 2021. The lawsuit was filed in a Miami-Dade County court and names CEO Jamie Dimon as a key figure in the dispute. Trump claims that the sudden closure of his accounts left him financially stranded and forced him to scramble for banking alternatives.

According to the complaint, JPMorgan Chase provided only 60 days' notice before closing Trump’s accounts and offered no explanation for the action. Trump’s legal team alleges that the bank acted due to the political environment at the time, writing that “JPMC debanked (Trump and his businesses) because it believed that the political tide at the moment favoured doing so,” as reported by the Associated Press. Trump further claimed he personally tried to resolve the issue with Jamie Dimon, who allegedly responded vaguely that he would “figure out what was happening,” but no resolution occurred. The lawsuit also asserts that Trump and his businesses were placed on a reputational “blacklist,” potentially blocking access to banking services at other institutions.

JPMorgan Chase has strongly rejected Trump’s allegations, calling the lawsuit “without merit.” A spokesperson clarified that “JPMC does not close accounts for political or religious reasons. We do close accounts because they create legal or regulatory risk for the company.” The bank expressed regret that Trump decided to pursue the matter in court, emphasising that their actions were based purely on compliance and regulatory considerations, not political bias.

The case comes amid growing tensions between the White House and major Wall Street institutions. Trump had previously threatened JPMorgan over its opposition to a proposed cap on credit card interest rates, which he claimed would reduce consumer costs. With JPMorgan being one of the largest credit card issuers in the US, the bank reportedly intends to resist any such caps, adding another layer of contention to the dispute.

The debanking issue, once considered niche, has evolved into a politically sensitive topic in the United States. Conservative commentators have previously accused the Obama administration of targeting specific businesses under “Operation Choke Point,” including gun stores and payday lenders. Similarly, after the January 6 Capitol attack, several right-leaning leaders alleged that banks cut ties with them citing “reputational risk,” sparking debates over political influence in financial services.

Trump’s legal team argues that JPMorgan’s conduct illustrates a systemic industry practice that pressures individuals and businesses to align with prevailing political ideologies. In addition to political bias, the lawsuit also includes charges of trade libel and alleges violations of Florida’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Lawyers representing Trump claim that the case exposes a broader trend of financial institutions using reputational risk as a pretext to limit access to essential banking services for politically disfavoured clients.

Financial analysts note that this lawsuit may have wide-ranging implications for the US banking sector. If Trump succeeds, banks may face heightened scrutiny over account closures, especially in politically charged contexts. The case also underscores tensions between political figures and financial institutions, highlighting the intersection of regulatory compliance, political influence, and consumer rights in the modern banking landscape.

Overall, Donald Trump’s USD 5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase signals a high-stakes battle at the intersection of politics and finance, raising questions about the accountability of major US banks and the legitimacy of debanking practices allegedly motivated by political considerations. The outcome of this case is expected to attract intense attention from legal experts, political analysts, and the banking industry alike.


Join our Telegram Channel for Latest News and Regular Updates.


Start your Mutual Fund Journey  by Opening Free Account in Asset Plus.


Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.

Related News

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice, investment advice, or trading recommendations.

Trading in stocks, forex, commodities, cryptocurrencies, or any other financial instruments involves high risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices can fluctuate rapidly, and there is a possibility of losing part or all of your invested capital.

We do not guarantee any profits, returns, or outcomes from the use of our website, services, or tools. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

You are solely responsible for your investment and trading decisions. Before making any financial commitment, it is strongly recommended to consult with a qualified financial advisor or do your own research.

By accessing or using this website, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to this disclaimer. The website owners, partners, or affiliates shall not be held liable for any direct or indirect loss or damage arising from the use of information, tools, or services provided here.

onlyfans leakedonlyfan leaksonlyfans leaked videos