US Government Targets Tech Vendors to Cut Federal Spending and Reform Contracting
Team Finance Saathi
02/Jun/2025

What's covered under the Article:
-
The US government is shifting focus to technology vendors like Dell and CDW to cut federal spending and overhaul contracting processes.
-
The General Services Administration demands detailed pricing breakdowns from tech firms to reduce excessive markups and costs.
-
The OneGov initiative promotes direct purchasing from manufacturers and reduces reliance on middlemen, aiming to save billions annually.
The Trump administration has escalated its efforts to cut federal spending by turning its focus from consulting giants to technology vendors. This marks a new phase in a comprehensive campaign to reshape how the US government procures goods and services. After months of high-profile contract cancellations and layoffs in the consulting sector, the administration has now moved its attention to technology suppliers that serve federal agencies, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
The Shift to Technology Vendors
The General Services Administration (GSA), a key federal procurement agency, recently sent formal letters to 10 technology companies, including major suppliers such as Dell and CDW. These companies operate as value-added resellers (VARs), meaning they assemble and provide technology services to various government departments. The US government spends over $80 billion annually on IT services, but the GSA highlighted that complex procurement processes have caused excessive markups and increased costs for taxpayers.
In the letters, the GSA requested these firms to justify their contract pricing by submitting detailed breakdowns of costs and markups. The companies are also asked to evaluate whether their prices are reasonable compared to best practices in the commercial sector. Responses were mandated by June 11, indicating the administration’s seriousness in this review.
Background: Consulting Sector Cuts
This scrutiny on tech vendors follows a wave of cutbacks in the consulting industry, which faced significant pressure earlier. Firms like Booz Allen Hamilton announced large layoffs, shedding thousands of jobs. Consulting giants such as Deloitte and Guidehouse were also forced to renegotiate or terminate contracts amid the administration's drive to rein in spending.
Since January, more than 11,000 contracts across 60 federal agencies have been cancelled, reportedly saving an estimated $33 billion. These contract cancellations spanned various departments, including IT services at the Department of Education and project management roles at the Treasury Department.
The OneGov Initiative and Procurement Reform
The cost-cutting push is part of an internal White House program known as OneGov. The initiative aims to consolidate procurement activities and promote outcomes-based contracts. Unlike traditional contracts that pay for billable hours or open-ended service delivery, outcomes-based contracts reward vendors for measurable results, ensuring better value for taxpayer money. The program also encourages federal agencies to rely more on in-house talent, reducing dependence on external contractors.
Josh Gruenbaum, head of the GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service, emphasized the need for a fundamental change in government operations, stating, “We don’t need to outsource everything.” He underlined that the government can indeed "shape shift" the way it conducts business to become more efficient and cost-effective.
Direct Purchasing to Bypass Middlemen
In April, President Trump signed an executive order that directed federal agencies to prioritize buying off-the-shelf products directly from manufacturers. This directive aims to minimize the role of resellers and intermediaries in government IT spending, potentially disrupting a multibillion-dollar segment of the federal technology supply chain.
The GSA's recent letters reinforce this directive by requiring tech vendors to disclose detailed pricing and by suggesting future purchases may entirely bypass VARs when feasible. This approach could significantly change how federal agencies acquire technology, pushing for more transparency and cost-efficiency.
Broader Implications and Future Outlook
Though Elon Musk has stepped away from his advisory role on government efficiency, officials confirm that the administration’s agenda to reduce federal spending remains robust. The current focus on technology vendors indicates that federal procurement, like consulting, is overdue for disruption.
An official involved in the process stated, “We’re not done.” The administration’s drive to overhaul how the government buys technology and services is expected to continue, aiming for substantial savings and more efficient government operations.
In conclusion, the Trump administration’s intensified scrutiny on technology vendors through the GSA's OneGov initiative signals a broader shift in federal procurement strategy. By demanding transparency in pricing, pushing for direct manufacturer purchases, and favoring outcome-based contracts, the government seeks to cut costs, reduce reliance on middlemen, and promote efficiency. This effort follows similar moves in the consulting sector and is likely to reshape the federal technology supply chain significantly in the years to come.
The Upcoming IPOs in this week and coming weeks are Ganga Bath Fittings, Victory Electric Vehicles International, Wagons Learning.
The Current active IPO are 3B Films
Start your Stock Market Journey and Apply in IPO by Opening Free Demat Account in Choice Broking FinX.
Join our Trading with CA Abhay Telegram Channel for regular Stock Market Trading and Investment Calls by CA Abhay Varn - SEBI Registered Research Analyst.
Related News
Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice, investment advice, or trading recommendations.
Trading in stocks, forex, commodities, cryptocurrencies, or any other financial instruments involves high risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices can fluctuate rapidly, and there is a possibility of losing part or all of your invested capital.
We do not guarantee any profits, returns, or outcomes from the use of our website, services, or tools. Past performance is not indicative of future results.You are solely responsible for your investment and trading decisions. Before making any financial commitment, it is strongly recommended to consult with a qualified financial advisor or do your own research.
By accessing or using this website, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to this disclaimer. The website owners, partners, or affiliates shall not be held liable for any direct or indirect loss or damage arising from the use of information, tools, or services provided here.